A recent SGA episode reminded me of something I had posted a while back in a comment. It’s not just about SGA, but about storytelling in general, both books and tv (and whatever other storytelling there is). You start in the middle of some action scene, and then backtrack to tell the reader/viewer how the characters came to be in the situation they are currently in.
It’s one thing to have the story start somewhere in the middle of the action and then go on, gradually revealing important bits throughout the storyline by letting the characters find out about it. That’s how good storytelling usually works.
It’s quite another thing to drop the reader/viewer into a random action scene and then interrupt the storyflow for stupid flashbacks that could all have been told chronologically. To me, this is cheating. The authors know that their backstory is too boring to keep the readers/viewers hooked right from the start, so they “force” them to sit through it with the use of flashbacks, instead of improving the backstory to make it more suspenseful.
It CAN be done well, but most of the time it isn’t. It certainly makes me lose my respect for the author/writer, and if it’s too bad I might drop the story completely, because I feel cheated.
But maybe that’s just me.
Current Mood: 
moody
Current Music: Turisas - Sahti-Waari